Skip to Main
Not currently for sale

Brookfield, Green Meadow Lane, Hambleton, Poulton-Le-Fylde

open for offer is the pre-market: owners can test the market and buyers can register interest in a home, whether or not it’s for sale.

Last sale

£440,000

HM Land Registry, March 2025.

Claiming your home is free. It does not list your home or commit you to selling.

The home

A detached home in FY6 9, sold in March 2025.

The last sale we hold from HM Land Registry: £440,000 in March 2025.

We hold no energy certificate for this home.

  1. Sold Mar 2025 for £440,000
  2. Sold Jun 2021 for £417,500
  3. Sold Jun 2000 for £152,000

Around it

Green Meadow Lane: 17 recorded sales from 1999 to 2025, £72,000 to £440,000.

17 sales on this street from February 1999 to March 2025, from HM Land Registry price paid data. Sales of this home are marked.

Recorded sales on Green Meadow Lane

  • Brookfield Green Meadow Lane£440,000Mar 2025
  • Brookfield Green Meadow Lane£417,500Jun 2021
  • Hirst Dene Green Meadow Lane£257,500May 2021
  • Meadow Croft Green Meadow Lane£180,000Nov 2020
  • Merivale Green Meadow Lane£250,000Aug 2019
  • West Point Green Meadow Lane£105,000Feb 2019
  • Ellis Dene Green Meadow Lane£158,000Aug 2016
  • Lynton Green Meadow Lane£173,000Apr 2015

Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

The queue

The queue on Brookfield, Green Meadow Lane, Hambleton

Nobody has registered interest in this home yet.

Anyone can register interest in any home, at any time. A figure named is not an offer. Your name isn’t shown in the queue.

Your move

Your move: claim Brookfield, Green Meadow Lane, Hambleton

Pick a price. See how many sales on this street were at that or more. We don’t keep it unless you register it.

Type a figure, or move the slider.

Middle £158,000This home, Jun 2000

Type a figure, or move the slider.

Not an offer or a valuation.

Sales here since 1999: £72,000 to £440,000, middle £158,000.

Have this page removed instead